Quote from: wdm1219inpenna on June 21, 2026, 11:17:27 AMMuch as I adore Vanna, I cannot help but wonder why she is still needed anymoreBecause she's Vanna White.
Much as I adore Vanna, I cannot help but wonder why she is still needed anymore
Much as I adore Vanna, I cannot help but wonder why she is still needed anymore, other than to make the puzzleboard look less barren.
Quote from: wdm1219inpenna on June 21, 2026, 11:17:27 AMMuch as I adore Vanna, I cannot help but wonder why she is still needed anymore, other than to make the puzzleboard look less barren. You didn't ask this question when the board went digital 25+ years ago?
Quote from: clemon79 on July 01, 2026, 03:09:24 AMQuote from: wdm1219inpenna on June 21, 2026, 11:17:27 AMMuch as I adore Vanna, I cannot help but wonder why she is still needed anymore, other than to make the puzzleboard look less barren. You didn't ask this question when the board went digital 25+ years ago?I maintain that digitalization didn't make Vanna's job obsolete because Vanna's job was always superfluous as far as the puzzle board itself was concerned. In 1975, there could have been a board design where stagehands swing the trilons just as they were already doing on shows like Pyramid. Vanna's (and Susan's) job is and was not too far removed from that of a model. Unnecessary for the "game" but terribly important for the "show."
I’m being lazy but didn’t Shoppers Bazaar do just that, but with pull cards similar to Fleming’s J!?
Also I'd like to add, I did not appreciate the tone in which that question was asked.This is not the first time either that I have encountered this kind of attitude on here, so I respectfully request to please be more respectful.Thank you.