Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Jackpot! Question  (Read 5071 times)

MikeK

  • Member
  • Posts: 5474
Re: Jackpot! Question
« Reply #15 on: January 20, 2026, 05:31:15 PM »
I am pretty sure I have seen people recall a 995 target and a 50 multiplier.  Bob Stewart kicked in the extra $250 to make it $50,000.

Adam Nedeff

  • Member
  • Posts: 1917
Re: Jackpot! Question
« Reply #16 on: January 20, 2026, 06:06:59 PM »
I am pretty sure I have seen people recall a 995 target and a 50 multiplier.  Bob Stewart kicked in the extra $250 to make it $50,000.
Whether it happened or it didn't, it can be said for sure that the Paley Center had an episode that's not in general circulation among the fans, where Geoff explicitly explains this rule.

Loogaroo

  • Member
  • Posts: 779
Re: Jackpot! Question
« Reply #17 on: January 21, 2026, 10:03:18 PM »
Did a $50,000 Super Jackpot ever come up...I don't mean was it won because I think the now famous $38,750 was the most ever awarded.

I may be misremembering what I've heard, but it was reportedly offered up once.

The riddle was something along the lines of: "My first half is present tense, my second half is past tense. What am I?" Neither player involved knew the answer. When Geoff revealed the answer - "See-Saw" - the crowd erupted in boos which persisted after each commercial break.
You're in a room. You're wearing a silly hat.
There are letters on the floor. They spell "NOPE".

carlisle96

  • Member
  • Posts: 440
Re: Jackpot! Question
« Reply #18 on: January 21, 2026, 10:19:27 PM »
Did a $50,000 Super Jackpot ever come up...I don't mean was it won because I think the now famous $38,750 was the most ever awarded.

I may be misremembering what I've heard, but it was reportedly offered up once.

The riddle was something along the lines of: "My first half is present tense, my second half is past tense. What am I?" Neither player involved knew the answer. When Geoff revealed the answer - "See-Saw" - the crowd erupted in boos which persisted after each commercial break.
If that's the way it was read, no wonder the players missed it and the audience was angry. It at least could have said it's the playground toy with a present and past tense name

Dbacksfan12

  • Member
  • Posts: 6332
  • Just leave the set; that’d be terrific.
Re: Jackpot! Question
« Reply #19 on: January 21, 2026, 10:20:30 PM »
It at least could have said it's the playground toy with a present and past tense name
For $50,000?  What else are they going to say?  The tire swing? 
--Mark
Phil 4:13

carlisle96

  • Member
  • Posts: 440
Re: Jackpot! Question
« Reply #20 on: January 21, 2026, 10:25:28 PM »
It at least could have said it's the playground toy with a present and past tense name
For $50,000?  What else are they going to say?  The tire swing?
I'm not sure what you mean, but the same riddle would have probably been asked if the Super Jackpot was just a couple of thousand dollars. It's a pretty cryptic clue when you only have five seconds to come up with the answer

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27923
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
Re: Jackpot! Question
« Reply #21 on: January 21, 2026, 11:15:05 PM »
I watched the Canadian version a fair bit and do not remember a super jackpot ever.

I can confirm they happened more than once. Primarily because I remember separate occasions where it was won and the riddler and King Of Teh Hill swapped out afterward and a different one where they did not.
Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe

BrandonFG

  • Member
  • Posts: 19418
  • Doesn't meet eligibility requirements
Re: Jackpot! Question
« Reply #22 on: January 22, 2026, 12:07:10 AM »
The riddle was something along the lines of: "My first half is present tense, my second half is past tense. What am I?" Neither player involved knew the answer. When Geoff revealed the answer - "See-Saw" - the crowd erupted in boos which persisted after each commercial break.
That's some diabolical shit, and I say this as someone who plays Best Guess Live every night.

/Some of you have seen my rants
"If you’re just joining us, we are preempting your regularly-scheduled encore episode of Celebrity Family Feud to bring you this special report."
--------
"You must be in the lobby at the dentist, 'cause you're watching the Game Show Network!"

Kevin Prather

  • Member
  • Posts: 6973
Re: Jackpot! Question
« Reply #23 on: January 22, 2026, 12:48:30 AM »
The riddle was something along the lines of: "My first half is present tense, my second half is past tense. What am I?" Neither player involved knew the answer. When Geoff revealed the answer - "See-Saw" - the crowd erupted in boos which persisted after each commercial break.
That's some diabolical shit, and I say this as someone who plays Best Guess Live every night.

/Some of you have seen my rants

Maybe I'll make "see-saw" my new default guess.

BrandonFG

  • Member
  • Posts: 19418
  • Doesn't meet eligibility requirements
Re: Jackpot! Question
« Reply #24 on: January 22, 2026, 01:18:06 AM »
Maybe I'll make "see-saw" my new default guess.
You. I like the cut of your jib.
"If you’re just joining us, we are preempting your regularly-scheduled encore episode of Celebrity Family Feud to bring you this special report."
--------
"You must be in the lobby at the dentist, 'cause you're watching the Game Show Network!"

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27923
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
Re: Jackpot! Question
« Reply #25 on: January 22, 2026, 03:29:50 PM »
I could easily see the target number board being treated as three independent drums each with various bits bypassed so that they can spin continuously until someone breaks the circuit (which would be the actual random part). Once that happens, each drum will continue to step until they reach a valid digit.

The end result would be not too dissimilar to a slot machine, and as an all-mechanical solution would be easier to fabricate in the 1970's than making a computer pick a random number and automate electronics to match.

That seems quite plausible!

Or, Occam's Razor being what it is, they could have drawn a target number and a multiplier out of a hat with S&P watching and then set up the Solari to load those numbers in on cue.

/This is Bob Stewart we're talking about. Never add expenses where there don't need to be any
//Frankly I'm shocked he kicked in the extra $250 to bring it to $50,000
///"We can build an electronic solution nobody will see, or we can buy a deck of Bikes at the drugstore for two bucks."
« Last Edit: January 22, 2026, 03:39:51 PM by clemon79 »
Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe

carlisle96

  • Member
  • Posts: 440
Re: Jackpot! Question
« Reply #26 on: January 22, 2026, 03:37:09 PM »
I could easily see the target number board being treated as three independent drums each with various bits bypassed so that they can spin continuously until someone breaks the circuit (which would be the actual random part). Once that happens, each drum will continue to step until they reach a valid digit.

The end result would be not too dissimilar to a slot machine, and as an all-mechanical solution would be easier to fabricate in the 1970's than making a computer pick a random number and automate electronics to match.

That seems quite plausible!

Or, Occam's Razor being what it is, they could have drawn a target number and a multiplier out of a hat with S&P watching and then set up the Solari to load those numbers in on cue.

/This is Bob Stewart we're talking about. Never add expenses where there don't need to be any
//Frankly I'm shocked he kicked in the extra $250 to bring it to $50,000
///"We can build an electronic solution nobody will see, or we can buy a deck of Bikes and a pair of dice at the drugstore for two bucks."
Yes, but I can't hear Don Pardo saying "These 16 players are here trying to win $49,750 in cash." It loses something somehow.

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27923
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
Re: Jackpot! Question
« Reply #27 on: January 22, 2026, 03:42:17 PM »
Yes, but I can't hear Don Pardo saying "These 16 players are here trying to win $49,750 in cash." It loses something somehow.

*headdesk*
Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe

PYLclark86

  • Member
  • Posts: 182
  • The Consolation Prize... to Your Heart <3
Re: Jackpot! Question
« Reply #28 on: January 22, 2026, 06:55:34 PM »
When Geoff revealed the answer - "See-Saw" - the crowd erupted in boos which persisted after each commercial break.

Jim Perry yearns for a joke so lousy it would get that reaction.

Adam Nedeff's old site had a small collection of Super Jackpot riddles and honestly, the see saw riddle was on par for what they used. The max payout is the 2025 equivalent of nearly $350,000. For that amount of money they can be extra hard.

Yes, but I can't hear Don Pardo saying "These 16 players are here trying to win $49,750 in cash." It loses something somehow.

Well I can because I have a BRIAN BRAIN injury! So there.
*Indecipherable screaming*

carlisle96

  • Member
  • Posts: 440
Re: Jackpot! Question
« Reply #29 on: January 22, 2026, 09:46:42 PM »
When Geoff revealed the answer - "See-Saw" - the crowd erupted in boos which persisted after each commercial break.

Jim Perry yearns for a joke so lousy it would get that reaction.

Adam Nedeff's old site had a small collection of Super Jackpot riddles and honestly, the see saw riddle was on par for what they used. The max payout is the 2025 equivalent of nearly $350,000. For that amount of money they can be extra hard.

Yes, but I can't hear Don Pardo saying "These 16 players are here trying to win $49,750 in cash." It loses something somehow.

Well I can because I have a BRIAN BRAIN injury! So there.
I wouldn't say it was extra hard ... it was more like hopeless