Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Improve One Pricing Game...  (Read 3822 times)

alfonzos

  • Member
  • Posts: 1050
Re: Improve One Pricing Game...
« Reply #60 on: May 22, 2025, 01:09:23 PM »
Quote
Start Pathfinder off by pricing all three prizes.
I disagree with one. The current format puts the pressure on the contestant through the entire puzzle. If a contestant knows that three saves have already been earned, the pressure is off until the last save has been used.

This is why the contestant isn't told it's called "Hole in Two" at the very beginning.
A Cliff Saber Production
email address: alfonzos@aol.com
Boardgame Geek user name: alfonzos

jjman920

  • Member
  • Posts: 1265
  • Mhoops.
Re: Improve One Pricing Game...
« Reply #61 on: May 22, 2025, 11:39:48 PM »
Two things always bugged me about Give or Keep: you weren’t actually “giving away” anything, and the “keep more than you give away” mechanic rewarded greed.
I mean, I guess. I just assumed that you were "giving away" the prize you didn't keep back to the house. I suppose it can be viewed as rewarding greed, but I never watch the game thinking "which one of these prizes would I want the most?" I'm just answering Bob's question of "which one of these is more expensive?" It's a quiz to me, not an exercise in personal value.

I love the concept of the game, I'm sad that it didn't play out well enough on TV for them to continue playing it. I'd love to see it come back with honestly no changes except bringing out and displaying the small prizes on stage instead of having to do the Shaky Turntable Shuffle.

Though I do love the idea of the prizes not kept being given to someone at home.
Me: Of all of the game shows you've hosted besides Jeopardy!, like High Rollers or Classic Concentration, which is your favorite?
Alex Trebek: I'd have to say To Tell The Truth, because it was the first time in my career that I got to sit down while I was hosting.