The Game Show Forum

The Game Show Forum => The Big Board => Topic started by: johnnysama on September 23, 2005, 06:54:50 PM

Title: Game Show Technology
Post by: johnnysama on September 23, 2005, 06:54:50 PM
I've wondered about the Press Your Luck big board. I know that the squares that stored the dollar amounts, whammies, and prizes surrounding the center logo were provided by slide projectors- but what about the center logo itself? Was that done by a slide projector?
Title: Game Show Technology
Post by: Brandon Brooks on September 23, 2005, 07:20:42 PM
[quote name=\'johnnysama\' date=\'Sep 23 2005, 05:54 PM\']I've wondered about the Press Your Luck big board. I know that the squares that stored the dollar amounts, whammies, and prizes surrounding the center logo were provided by slide projectors- but what about the center logo itself? Was that done by a slide projector?
[snapback]97534[/snapback]
[/quote]
No, just a big old light box.

Brandon Brooks
Title: Game Show Technology
Post by: JasonA1 on September 24, 2005, 02:05:25 AM
With cameras poking out of the black space (I believe the one between YOUR and LUCK but not entirely sure)

-Jason
Title: Game Show Technology
Post by: tyshaun1 on September 24, 2005, 01:57:59 PM
[quote name=\'JasonA1\' date=\'Sep 24 2005, 02:05 AM\']With cameras poking out of the black space (I believe the one between YOUR and LUCK but not entirely sure)

-Jason
[snapback]97554[/snapback]
[/quote]

There were 2 cameras, one between PRESS and YOUR, and one between YOUR and LUCK. That was the reason why you had the shot behind Peter when the game was winding down, since both cameras were used to provide the split shot of the two competing contestants. Something I've always wondered, though, is how they were able to get 2 cameras, 2 operators, and the board electronics all inside there.

Tyshaun
Title: Game Show Technology
Post by: Ian Wallis on September 25, 2005, 09:55:47 PM
Quote
There were 2 cameras, one between PRESS and YOUR, and one between YOUR and LUCK. That was the reason why you had the shot behind Peter when the game was winding down, since both cameras were used to provide the split shot of the two competing contestants.


And occasionallly, if a whammy was hit in that situation, you'd hear the sound effect but wouldn't see the whammy because they had no camera to cut to in which to superimpose the whammy.  That happened more in the first year of the series than the last two.
Title: Game Show Technology
Post by: davemackey on September 25, 2005, 11:17:51 PM
[quote name=\'Ian Wallis\' date=\'Sep 25 2005, 09:55 PM\']
Quote
There were 2 cameras, one between PRESS and YOUR, and one between YOUR and LUCK. That was the reason why you had the shot behind Peter when the game was winding down, since both cameras were used to provide the split shot of the two competing contestants.


And occasionallly, if a whammy was hit in that situation, you'd hear the sound effect but wouldn't see the whammy because they had no camera to cut to in which to superimpose the whammy.  That happened more in the first year of the series than the last two.
[snapback]97643[/snapback]
[/quote]
The Whammy animation came out of an electronic generator and was not shot by a camera.

I think the reason was that Bill Carruthers, skilled a director as he was, couldn't cleanly cut to a one-shot of the contestant involved, while the split-screen effect of the two contestants was being used.
Title: Game Show Technology
Post by: clemon79 on September 26, 2005, 12:15:20 AM
[quote name=\'davemackey\' date=\'Sep 25 2005, 08:17 PM\']I think the reason was that Bill Carruthers, skilled a director as he was, couldn't cleanly cut to a one-shot of the contestant involved, while the split-screen effect of the two contestants was being used.
[/quote]
Wouldn't have a thing to do with the director, and everything to do with possible limitations of either the technical director the video switcher itself.

To piece together the Last Spin shot, you'd have to use one effects bus to do the half-wipe, and then a second one to DVE the whole schmiel into the middle of the gameboard. From there you would need to be able to take to the Whammy animation supered over the camera shot.

We know it's very possible to go from a one-shot of a player DVE'd into the board to a Whammy shot (this is sounding like a bad porno movie!) because they did it all the time.

So maybe the key to the whole mystery is the bus that is taken up by the half-wipe.
Title: Game Show Technology
Post by: NickintheATL on September 26, 2005, 08:26:42 AM
Usually, in most cases anyway, you'd see the split-screen when you would reach an empasse in the game, usually when someone was about to hit a fourth whammy, or on the last spin of the game.  It was rare, but I can vouch for the problem brought up that they couldn't get to a clean shot of the contestant.

My thoughts on what Tyshaun mentioned about how they could fit two cameras as described behind the gameboard. Either they built the platforms behind the board especially to fit the cameras in to the height they needed them, or they had some camera operators with funky heights to operate them :-P (probably the former, the latter is a tasteless joke)
Title: Game Show Technology
Post by: Robert Hutchinson on September 26, 2005, 11:47:58 PM
I think this is being vastly overcomplicated.

Was there ever any situation where, after going to the split-screen shot, hitting a whammy didn't end the game? "You need at least $1500 . . . stop at a Whammy! Hang on, don't get excited yet, Lois, we have to watch Steve's money get wiped out by the lawnmower . . . hang on . . . hang on . . . okay, now you win!" Not good TV.
Title: Game Show Technology
Post by: Kevin Prather on September 27, 2005, 12:07:45 AM
[quote name=\'Robert Hutchinson\' date=\'Sep 26 2005, 08:47 PM\']Was there ever any situation where, after going to the split-screen shot, hitting a whammy didn't end the game?
[snapback]97764[/snapback]
[/quote]

That's what I was thinking, but I do seem to remember it happening. It stayed on split screen, you heard the whammy, and gameplay continued. I don't remember the circumstances, but I remember it happening. Maybe it was only on split screen by accident?
Title: Game Show Technology
Post by: clemon79 on September 27, 2005, 01:00:41 AM
[quote name=\'whoserman\' date=\'Sep 26 2005, 09:07 PM\']That's what I was thinking, but I do seem to remember it happening. It stayed on split screen, you heard the whammy, and gameplay continued. I don't remember the circumstances, but I remember it happening. Maybe it was only on split screen by accident?
[/quote]
Was it a passed-spin end of the first round kind of situation?
Title: Game Show Technology
Post by: Esoteric Eric on September 27, 2005, 01:08:43 AM
[quote name=\'whoserman\' date=\'Sep 26 2005, 09:07 PM\'][quote name=\'Robert Hutchinson\' date=\'Sep 26 2005, 08:47 PM\']Was there ever any situation where, after going to the split-screen shot, hitting a whammy didn't end the game?[/quote]That's what I was thinking, but I do seem to remember it happening. It stayed on split screen, you heard the whammy, and gameplay continued.[/quote]While nowhere near the PYL fan some folks around here are, I recall that the split-screen shot was only used when the contestant in the lead would win the game if the spinner a) Whammied or b) didn't surpass the leader's score on that spin (unless the spinner earned a free spin).  If I'm right, then a Whammy in split-screen would end the game.
(Of course, it was also possible the spinner could win the game on the last spin.  Or am I trying out for Masters of the Obvious?)

Esoteric Eric, who remembers a few last-spin, split-screen Whammies w/ no animation, just an aural combination of Whammy audio under the win theme and Peter T.'s shouting
Title: Game Show Technology
Post by: clemon79 on September 27, 2005, 01:43:18 AM
[quote name=\'Esoteric Eric\' date=\'Sep 26 2005, 10:08 PM\']I recall that the split-screen shot was only used when the contestant in the lead would win the game if the spinner a) Whammied or b) didn't surpass the leader's score on that spin (unless the spinner earned a free spin).  If I'm right, then a Whammy in split-screen would end the game.
[/quote]
You are right, but some folks here are claiming that the shot was used, maybe fleetingly, in situations where it WASN'T a game-ending condition. I'd love it if said folks came forward and explained what those situations might have been. :)
Title: Game Show Technology
Post by: Dbacksfan12 on September 27, 2005, 01:47:36 AM
[quote name=\'clemon79\' date=\'Sep 27 2005, 12:43 AM\']You are right, but some folks here are claiming that the shot was used, maybe fleetingly, in situations where it WASN'T a game-ending condition. I'd love it if said folks came forward and explained what those situations might have been. :)
[/quote]
I seem to recall that on occasion, if a large number of spins was passed, they would go to the split screen.
Title: Game Show Technology
Post by: BrandonFG on September 27, 2005, 02:01:58 AM
[quote name=\'Modor\' date=\'Sep 27 2005, 12:47 AM\']I seem to recall that on occasion, if a large number of spins was passed, they would go to the split screen.
[snapback]97776[/snapback]
[/quote]

Bingo, and IIRC, it was usually when just two contestants were playing against each other because the third player "whammied" out of the game.

Come to think of it, can someone check the bidding war that got up to $31K before someone hit a Whammy (I don't have RealPlayer)? I don't remember if a split-screen was used, but it came to mind when Mark mentioned the multiple spins.
Title: Game Show Technology
Post by: jdhernandez on September 27, 2005, 04:42:59 AM
[quote name=\'fostergray82\' date=\'Sep 27 2005, 01:01 AM\']Come to think of it, can someone check the bidding war that got up to $31K before someone hit a Whammy (I don't have RealPlayer)? I don't remember if a split-screen was used, but it came to mind when Mark mentioned the multiple spins.
[snapback]97779[/snapback]
[/quote]

I was JUST thinking about that when I read about this!

Off the top of my head, I do recall that there was no split-screens going on between Lori and Cathy. There wasn't even a split-screen when Cathy lost the $31k. However, there was a split-screen after Randy got passed back a couple spins from Lori, and he hit a whammy! After that, there was still a split-screen going on between just Lori and Randy, even though it wasn't the last spin of the game, or someone was going to whammy out. As it turned out, Randy nailed another whammy and lost the game. (and if anybody accuses me of posting a spoiler at this point...I will drop a pizza on your head)

As some of you may recall, when Randy whammied, you could see him and Lori, and you could HEAR the whammy....but we saw no animation! Both cameras were fixed on a certain view of Randy and Lori since the split-screen was up.

This is all just off the top of my non-whooshed head, of course.
Title: Game Show Technology
Post by: MSTieScott on September 27, 2005, 04:00:00 PM
I also seem to remember an instance where they had the split-screen up because a player had a lot of passed spins and three Whammies, but he then hit "$2000 or Lose 1 Whammy" and elected to lose the Whammy. I can't remember whether they left the split-screen going or whether they went to the over-the-shoulder shot of Peter while they got rid of the split-screen, but that could be another cause of a Whammy animation playing during a split-screen.

--
Scott Robinson
Title: Game Show Technology
Post by: Robert Hutchinson on September 27, 2005, 10:21:09 PM
Based on the wealth of knowledge offered since my last post, I'm going to hazard a guess. It was the producers' intent only to go split-screen during spins where a Whammy would end the game (this included the entire subsets "one spin remaining", "three Whammies and passed spins", etc.). Not showing the animation because the camera shot wasn't correct, and not showing it because it would delay the celebration, was a happy coincidence. The director occasionally screwed up the split-screening, and animation-less non-game-ending Whammies resulted. "The end."
Title: Game Show Technology
Post by: NickintheATL on September 27, 2005, 11:49:18 PM
[quote name=\'Robert Hutchinson\' date=\'Sep 27 2005, 10:21 PM\']Based on the wealth of knowledge offered since my last post, I'm going to hazard a guess. It was the producers' intent only to go split-screen during spins where a Whammy would end the game (this included the entire subsets "one spin remaining", "three Whammies and passed spins", etc.). Not showing the animation because the camera shot wasn't correct, and not showing it because it would delay the celebration, was a happy coincidence. The director occasionally screwed up the split-screening, and animation-less non-game-ending Whammies resulted. "The end."
[/quote]

Actually, I think it needs to be mentioned here that they NEVER had an animation on a Whammy that ended the game. It went straight to the celebration.
Title: Game Show Technology
Post by: jdhernandez on September 28, 2005, 03:46:59 AM
[quote name=\'NicholasM79\' date=\'Sep 27 2005, 10:49 PM\']Actually, I think it needs to be mentioned here that they NEVER had an animation on a Whammy that ended the game. It went straight to the celebration.
[snapback]97887[/snapback]
[/quote]

*goes on snippy mode*

THAT'S NOT TRUE!

I just saw this one a few days ago while I was organizing stuff. One episode had a holiday whammy playing at the very end of the game before they cut to a shot of the actual winner. There was a strange delayed win reaction there, too. Weird, no?

As for the other post, the split-screen did get screwed up, so as to cause a VERY delayed reaction on the win. The Jennie Jones episode comes to mind right now. A split-screen of the other two players (whose names escape me right now, I think I'm getting old...) was being shown, and the lady hit the whammy....

...and after a few seconds, we saw Jennie's jumping for joy that she won so unexpectedly!

.....I'm too lazy to check my own site right now. :-p