The multi-million dollar judgement has been thrown out, there will be a new trial.
[citation needed] on just about everything you posted
I edited my above post as my post was intended to be based on speculation.
I don\'t know the facts, yet. When the verdict is revealed, we will know what may have really happened. Or we may never know.
A thing might happen. Or it may not happen. We may never know. Gee thanks, that\'s awfully insightful of you.I don\'t know the facts, yet. When the verdict is revealed, we will know what may have really happened. Or we may never know.
I don\'t know the facts, yet. When the verdict is revealed, we will know what may have really happened. Or we may never know.
To put it another way, \"That post presents information based in part on theory & conjecture. The poster\'s purpose is to suggest some possible explanations, but not necessarily the only ones to the mystery that is examined.\"
I think it is highly improper to try and guess what another person is thinking in cases like this; JonSea is marginally capable of telling us what he meant there.To put it another way, \"That post presents information based in part on theory & conjecture. The poster\'s purpose is to suggest some possible explanations, but not necessarily the only ones to the mystery that is examined.\"
\"That post presents information based in part on theory & conjecture.
You misspelled \"perceptions and beliefs.\"
It\'s when they get stated as fact (and I don\'t care if he fixed it after the fact; he knew better than to do it in the first place) that there\'s an issue.
when she may really have been let go maybe because of...lack of charisma...as she may have been losing it after her 2007 miscarriage.
Wow, I didn\'t think I would stir such controversy with my speculations. Makes me wonder if these boards are strictly for the purpose of discussing facts and not speculations without any proof to back them up? If so, then I apologize for my problems, and I think I should only post when absolutely necessary.
I can see why the thread I created about The Joker\'s Wild a while ago seemed to be pretty legit.
Makes me wonder if these boards are strictly for the purpose of discussing facts and not speculations without any proof to back them up?
Best. Ponderance. Evar.
Wow, I didn\'t think I would stir such controversy with my speculations. Makes me wonder if these boards are strictly for the purpose of discussing facts and not speculations without any proof to back them up? If so, then I apologize for my problems, and I think I should only post when absolutely necessary.
I don\'t know what you\'re getting at, but your post comes off a little passive-aggressive. There\'s nothing wrong with speculating, except when you start trying to pass it off as fact. It\'s no different than throwing your two cents into a face-to-face conversation; if you want to speculate, make it known.
Had you said \"In my opinion, this all happened because ___\", then offered a few examples as possible precedents, it would\'ve been a different story, so long as you noted that A ≠ B. You tried to tie up the loose ends with your edit, but it still didn\'t tie up everything.
When\'s the new trial going to begin?