The Game Show Forum

The Game Show Forum => The Big Board => Topic started by: tomarkenfan77 on August 29, 2003, 01:59:16 PM

Title: Question
Post by: tomarkenfan77 on August 29, 2003, 01:59:16 PM
is GSN going to pick up the George's Weakest Link?
Title: Question
Post by: zachhoran on August 29, 2003, 08:00:12 PM
[quote name=\'tomarkenfan77\' date=\'Aug 29 2003, 12:59 PM\'] is GSN going to pick up the George's Weakest Link? [/quote]
 It would be nice for them to do that, if only to break the monontony of Anne's 75 or so episodes being run to death for the past eight months. I've often wondered if GSN COULD even go a step further and perhaps resurrect LInk with George as an original, without a whole lot of budget tweaking(seeing as how many winning totals were under $10K, less than a lot of one-day Whammy! wins have been)
Title: Question
Post by: Michael Brandenburg on August 30, 2003, 09:42:57 PM
I just noticed something myself last Friday (8-29-2003) when I was glancing through the USA Today's weekend TV listings that they published on that date:

   It seems that GSN has Weakest Link on at 8:00 P.M. Eastern time on Sunday nights, and since the listing covers the entire 8-9 P.M. block, I'm assuming that it's the Robinson version that NBC used to air in that same time slot until a little over a year ago.

   Unfortunately, the USA Today's Sunday evening TV grids don't show the programs that air before 8:00 P.M. Eastern time, and GSN's program schedule listing isn't carried in either of the Cincinnati area's newspaper TV magazines.  So I would like to know this: GSN isn't airing any early-evening NBA basketball games that could run past 8:00 P.M. Eastern time, are they?


   Michael Brandenburg
   (Yes, I know the NBA basketball season is over -- but WSTR in Cincinnati is currently re-running baseball games from clear back to 1990 on Sundays!)
Title: Question
Post by: Dbacksfan12 on August 30, 2003, 11:27:54 PM
[quote name=\'Michael Brandenburg\' date=\'Aug 30 2003, 08:42 PM\'] I just noticed something myself last Friday (8-29-2003) when I was glancing through the USA Today's weekend TV listings that they published on that date:

   It seems that GSN has Weakest Link on at 8:00 P.M. Eastern time on Sunday nights, and since the listing covers the entire 8-9 P.M. block, I'm assuming that it's the Robinson version that NBC used to air in that same time slot until a little over a year ago.

   Unfortunately, the USA Today's Sunday evening TV grids don't show the programs that air before 8:00 P.M. Eastern time, and GSN's program schedule listing isn't carried in either of the Cincinnati area's newspaper TV magazines.  So I would like to know this: GSN isn't airing any early-evening NBA basketball games that could run past 8:00 P.M. Eastern time, are they?


   Michael Brandenburg
   (Yes, I know the NBA basketball season is over -- but WSTR in Cincinnati is currently re-running baseball games from clear back to 1990 on Sundays!) [/quote]
 Are you serious?
Why would GSN show NBA basketball?
Title: Question
Post by: ilb4ever2000 on August 30, 2003, 11:53:46 PM
Quote
Are you serious?
Why would GSN show NBA basketball?

NBA Basketball interrupted the Robinson shows when they aired on NBC. That's why he made the comment.
Title: Question
Post by: rugrats1 on August 31, 2003, 03:45:02 AM
And don't forget that Dateline also got preferential treatment -- sporting events that end after 7PM ET was usually followed by dateline in its 1-hour entirety, then Weakest Link in progress, just so they can show the movie on time at 9PM ET.
Title: Question
Post by: ChuckNet on August 31, 2003, 01:01:19 PM
Quote
It would be nice for them to do that, if only to break the monontony of Anne's 75 or so episodes being run to death for the past eight months.

I don't think they're even running THAT many...aren't celeb shows reserved exclusively for Sun night? That would put the number of eps running in the weekday slot to somewhere around 45.

Chuck Donegan (The Illustrious \"Chuckie Baby\")
Title: Question
Post by: uncamark on September 02, 2003, 05:50:55 PM
[quote name=\'tomarkenfan77\' date=\'Aug 29 2003, 12:59 PM\']is GSN going to pick up the George's Weakest Link?[/quote]
Not until Pax goes out of business or their contract to air the syndie version runs out.

At least with GE buying Vivendi Universal and its cable network holdings, at least those of you with hostile feelings towards \"Fear Factor\" can rest assured that the off-network package will probably be going straight to USA Network and that GSN probably won't get a chance to bid for it.  But I could be wrong.
Title: Question
Post by: HSquares2003 on September 02, 2003, 08:12:21 PM
The way GSN picked up the Robinson eps. before they cooled off makes me think that we will see the George eps. in Jan. 2004.
Title: Question
Post by: Ian Wallis on September 03, 2003, 08:50:27 AM
Quote
at least those of you with hostile feelings towards \"Fear Factor\" can rest assured that the off-network package will probably be going straight to USA Network and that GSN probably won't get a chance to bid for it. But I could be wrong.


I hope GSN won't bid for \"Fear Factor\".  Although that's actually one of the few \"reality\" shows I like, I still don't really consider it a game show, and I don't think it belongs on GSN.  But that didn't stop them from adding \"Love Connection\"...
Title: Question
Post by: BrandonFG on September 03, 2003, 02:26:23 PM
[quote name=\'Ian Wallis\' date=\'Sep 3 2003, 07:50 AM\']
Quote
at least those of you with hostile feelings towards "Fear Factor" can rest assured that the off-network package will probably be going straight to USA Network and that GSN probably won't get a chance to bid for it. But I could be wrong.


I hope GSN won't bid for "Fear Factor".  Although that's actually one of the few "reality" shows I like, I still don't really consider it a game show, and I don't think it belongs on GSN.  But that didn't stop them from adding "Love Connection"... [/quote]
 Who Dares Wins.
Title: Question
Post by: catkins522 on September 03, 2003, 03:14:38 PM
I want to see Suvivor again!

Charles
Title: Question
Post by: Brandon Brooks on September 03, 2003, 04:10:13 PM
[quote name=\'catkins522\' date=\'Sep 3 2003, 02:14 PM\'] I want to see Suvivor again!

Charles [/quote]
 Good for you, 'cause I sure don't.

Brandon Brooks
Title: Question
Post by: zachhoran on September 03, 2003, 11:19:12 PM
[quote name=\'Brandon Brooks\' date=\'Sep 3 2003, 03:10 PM\'] [quote name=\'catkins522\' date=\'Sep 3 2003, 02:14 PM\'] I want to see Suvivor again!

Charles [/quote]
Good for you, 'cause I sure don't.

Brandon Brooks [/quote]
 I think reruns of Survivor and some of these other \"game operas\" or whatever you want to call them will be part of The Reality Channel, which will premiere on some cable systems next year(and will probably experience slow growth over the next few subsequent years like GSN years). Whether the powers that be at The Reality Channel will include \"game shows\" in their reality show definition remains to be seen, but I doubt it.
Title: Question
Post by: uncamark on September 04, 2003, 12:40:50 PM
The actual name of the channel (last I heard) was Reality Central--and the guy who's starting it is actually having crews follow him around recording everything leading to the launch for a series for said channel, despite the failure of \"The Real Roseanne Show.\"
Title: Question
Post by: tommycharles on September 04, 2003, 01:57:27 PM
[quote name=\'Ian Wallis\' date=\'Sep 3 2003, 07:50 AM\'] I hope GSN won't bid for "Fear Factor".  Although that's actually one of the few "reality" shows I like, I still don't really consider it a game show, and I don't think it belongs on GSN.  But that didn't stop them from adding "Love Connection"... [/quote]
 I don't want to tug at this thread again, but I see no real reason that this is any less of a game show than Beat the Clock.
Title: Question
Post by: clemon79 on September 04, 2003, 03:28:52 PM
[quote name=\'tommycharles\' date=\'Sep 4 2003, 10:57 AM\'] I don't want to tug at this thread again, but I see no real reason that this is any less of a game show than Beat the Clock. [/quote]
 It's certainly the best qualified of the crop out there, for sure.
Title: Question
Post by: Matt Ottinger on September 04, 2003, 04:42:14 PM
I got no problem beating this \"is it or isn't it\" horse to death.

And I agree with Tommy.  Fear Factor is a lot closer to \"Beat The Clock\" or \"Truth or Consequences\" than it is Survivor.  Dog Eat Dog too, while we're at it.  NBC likes calling those shows \"reality shows\" because it just sounds cooler than \"game shows\".

Good rule of thumb (and one of the ways I decide what is or is not in The Compendium) is whether the show features an ongoing cast of characters being whittled away, as opposed to being self contained or having a defending champion.  Yes, that does put The Amazing Race on the \"reality\" side of the debate.  I'm OK with that.
Title: Question
Post by: tommycharles on September 04, 2003, 08:43:49 PM
[quote name=\'Matt Ottinger\' date=\'Sep 4 2003, 03:42 PM\'] I got no problem beating this "is it or isn't it" horse to death.

And I agree with Tommy.  Fear Factor is a lot closer to "Beat The Clock" or "Truth or Consequences" than it is Survivor.  Dog Eat Dog too, while we're at it.  NBC likes calling those shows "reality shows" because it just sounds cooler than "game shows".

Good rule of thumb (and one of the ways I decide what is or is not in The Compendium) is whether the show features an ongoing cast of characters being whittled away, as opposed to being self contained or having a defending champion.  Yes, that does put The Amazing Race on the "reality" side of the debate.  I'm OK with that. [/quote]
 That's kind of a good rule, my personal judgement usually relies on whether the other contestants have a say (by voting) in who wins. Thus, Fear Factor, The Mole, and The Amazing Race all make the cut in my book, and while Survivor is entertaining, it isn't a game show.

Oh, and before someone starts up about them having games and giving away money and cars, The Regis Gets Interrupted Constantly By Someone I Hadn't Heard of Before They Were On His Show Hour does that too.

Yours,
T
Title: Question
Post by: Matt Ottinger on September 04, 2003, 09:24:32 PM
Quote
That's kind of a good rule, my personal judgement usually relies on whether the other contestants have a say (by voting) in who wins. Thus, Fear Factor, The Mole, and The Amazing Race all make the cut in my book, and while Survivor is entertaining, it isn't a game show.
Problem with rules is you ought to be able to apply them across the board.  With that rule, \"Weakest Link\" and \"Dirty Rotten Cheater\" (to name but two) aren't game shows.
Title: Question
Post by: Brandon Brooks on September 04, 2003, 09:38:42 PM
[quote name=\'Matt Ottinger\' date=\'Sep 4 2003, 08:24 PM\'] Problem with rules is you ought to be able to apply them across the board.  With that rule, \"Weakest Link\" and \"Dirty Rotten Cheater\" (to name but two) aren't game shows. [/quote]
Wait a sec... that's not right.

Quote
Good rule of thumb (and one of the ways I decide what is or is not in The Compendium) is whether the show features an ongoing cast of characters being whittled away, as opposed to being self contained or having a defending champion.
So wouldn't that make TWL and Dirty Rotten Cheater true game shows since they are self contained?  If not, that makes Debt, TJW '90, Wintuition, and hell, even TPIR are not game shows.

Goes to show that there is no perfect rule.  And that I'm obsessively into semantics.

Brandon Brooks