The Game Show Forum > The Big Board
Steve Beverly interview with Tom Kennedy
inturnaround:
Oh, I respect the work he puts into the site and the love he has for game shows. And I respect that he's a journalist with a lot of accomplishments. I'm just saying that there's room for a website that doesn't have his viewpoint that reports the news.
I'm not irked by his success. It really is hard work. I just disagree with some of his viewpoints and think another way can be successful.
That being said, I agree that it isn't easy to commit to a website without a strong leader and staff. But SB has a staff (unless he refers to himself in the third person in the stories he writes), so I don't see why it couldn't (in theory, at least) work. What's past is not always prologue.
urbanpreppie05:
Well put, Tim.
Now normally, I defend some of Steve's views, and the way he does things sometimes-I always used the argument, \"It's his site, he's the premiere site for info on GS.\"
However, this is WRONG. Steve, if you are reading this, You were wrong in taking his pics. That's not fair to Adam, and that's just rude.
davemackey:
It's entirely possible that Steve may be using the same source material. Aren't those grabs off a Shokus tape? We all know Steve is good buddes with Stu Shostak.
CoreyArcher:
[quote name=\'whampyl03\' date=\'Jul 21 2003, 02:44 PM\']Well really, in retrospect, what can you expect from a media person? They will cheat, and lie, and cut every corner to make an appealing story.[/quote]
That's a gross and offensive generalization.
A media person,
- CA -
Chelsea Thrasher:
Since when was YDS '75 on Shokus tapes?
Covering the Screengrabs
First off, let's start with the logo pic. The chase lights, if you look really closely, are in the EXACT same position. This could, FEASIBLY, be coincidence.
But, in the 2nd picture, the coincidence window is stretched RAZOR thin. Everyone and everything are in the EXACT same spots in both pictures. The only differences are that A)The Brightness has been turned up a tad, B)The Edges have been slightly cropped [which is the case for nearly all pics on his sight], and C)There's JPEG artifacts in the picture from where the file was resaved...
(There are rarely if ever artifacts left over in an original screengrab.....I know there are none in the ones I take using my Dazzle [and by default, WinXP saves the screens in JPG format]. It's only after you take a pic into an editor and edit/resave it that the artifacts appear [The amount of artifacts is dependent on the compression amount...default leaves a noticeable but not major amount, which the pic in question has])
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version