The Game Show Forum > The Big Board
Steve Beverly interview with Tom Kennedy
PeterMarshallFan:
[quote name=\'CBSJokersWildFan\' date=\'Jul 21 2003, 03:50 PM\'] [quote name=\'PeterMarshallFan\' date=\'Jul 21 2003, 04:45 PM\']I got the wild notion that that was Beverly under an alias. [/quote]
It's not. I just happen to be a frequent reader of Professor Beverly's page. I apologize if I ruffled any feathers here. [/quote]
No problem. Like I said, it was a wild notion that just jumped into my head.
--- Quote --- As Mike Klauss used to say, \"You can't spell SB without BS!\"
--- End quote ---
And you can't spell \"Steve Beverly\" without \"steel!\" [I know, it's a stretch]
Brian44:
[quote name=\'clemon79\' date=\'Jul 21 2003, 03:14 PM\'] (hey, has "sanctimonious proselytizing" ever been a WOF puzzle?) [/quote]
Well, Chris, I believe \"PROSELYTIZING\" was a Megaword Puzzle back in May of 1993. ;)
Matt Ottinger:
--- Quote ---I apologize if I ruffled any feathers here.
--- End quote ---
No problem, but you do need to understand that this isn't a matter of disagreeing with an opinion. Virtually all of us regularly read the site, even many who claim they don't. We can debate about the seriousness of the \"crime\" all we want, and of course you're welcome to have any opinion you want about the man himself. But to suggest that the pictures accidentally made their way to Steve's site, or that he didn't mean for them to appear there, really doesn't make any sense. You do understand the meaning of the word \"inadvertently\", don't you?
SplitSecond:
Never mind the screen grabs. Technically, those aren't your property. If you made a print replication of a Warhol painting, then Steve went and made an exact replication using the same process, I really wouldn't recommend revving up your respective attorneys, because both of you could be found to be in hot water if there was any notion that either of you were using the images as part of a commercial venture.
What really irks me is the fact that the man is basically interviewing himself, and poor Tom Kennedy is merely a bystander.
BrandonFG:
[quote name=\'SplitSecond\' date=\'Jul 21 2003, 05:30 PM\'] What really irks me is the fact that the man is basically interviewing himself, and poor Tom Kennedy is merely a bystander. [/quote]
The same can be said with his interview with Kathy Garver, where Steve leads her into talking about how family-unfriendly TV is...interesting she mentions PAX, which I thought was in (ObGameShow) jeopardy.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version