The Game Show Forum > Game Show Channels & Networks

GSN, R.I.P.?

<< < (4/15) > >>

clemon79:
[quote name=\'beatlefreak84\' date=\'Jul 9 2003, 08:45 AM\'] And how many of you were PO'ed that they picked LC instead of Scrabble for Chuck's classic show?  :)
 [/quote]
 The possibility does exist, you know, that they were unable to secure Scrabble, and therefore had little choice but to get LC, if they wanted a Woolery-hosted show that wasn't Greed or WOF.

To be angry at a programming decision like that when you don't know half of the details, much less all of them, shows a great deal of ignorance.

The amount of whining in this thread is getting completely and utterly nauseating.

Dan Sadro:
[quote name=\'beatlefreak84\' date=\'Jul 9 2003, 10:45 AM\'] Also, we're not the only ones who enjoy the classics.  As I mentioned in another thread, when my friends talk about and/or watch GSN, they mention the CLASSICS, not the ORIGINALS (I have one friend who likes "Cram" and another who despises "Lingo," and that's all they say about the originals).  Trust me, there are way more people that will raise an eyebrow to mention of "Bumper Stumpers" than will to "Cram;" at least, among people I know!
 [/quote]
 I think the people you know are not the standard-grade game show fans and are closer to becoming the hardcore fans that us wonderful people on this board are.  If I mentioned Bumper Stumpers to a standard-issue game show fan, I'd be immediately checked into a drug rehabilitation clinic.


--- Quote ---As Matt said, nostalgia isn't what it used to be anymore, and he's right.  Instead of being a cornerstone, it's almost as if the classics are filler, and we all know that shouldn't be.
--- End quote ---

Why shouldn't it be?  Considering that the worst original is better than half of the shows they've had access to these 8-1/2 years, classics being filler could be a reasonable expectation.


--- Quote ---BTW, I'm in that demo, and nothing ticks me off more than shows aimed at me since they're too flashy and don't even care about entertainment value; what's the point in wathching with that?
--- End quote ---

Maybe because you're not the average person in the demo?  I've come to accept that I'm far from average as far as television goes, so I end up watching some things that (based on age, gender, and location) I wouldn't be expected to watch.  I'm far from average because I'd prefer old, faded reruns of The $20,000 Pyramid to the current version (although I'm not knocking the current version at every possibile moment).

PeterMarshallFan:
I don't see why GSN just doesn't put some rare stuff on in the mornings from 9-12. That could shut up the BC's and JC's of GSN for a while and still have the primetime for originals.

beatlefreak84:

--- Quote ---To be angry at a programming decision like that when you don't know half of the details, much less all of them, shows a great deal of ignorance.
--- End quote ---

Maybe next time I'll BOLD the smiley face, Chris!  Trust me, I don't have a hit list of all GSN employees on my computer, okay?  I was a little upset at the fact that LC is on the schedule, but, you're right, I don't know the circumstances behind it, and that's why I'm not upset anymore.  I've come to accept it as well as I have the originals.


--- Quote ---I think the people you know are not the standard-grade game show fans and are closer to becoming the hardcore fans that us wonderful people on this board are. If I mentioned Bumper Stumpers to a standard-issue game show fan, I'd be immediately checked into a drug rehabilitation clinic.

--- End quote ---

Well, I do have one friend who can probably fit in quite well on this board, but the rest are about as clueless toward game shows as you can get (one even asked me if Bob Barker was still hosting TPIR).  My father, for example, didn't even know what \"Pyramid\" was yet knew \"Bumper Stumpers,\" and he profoundly hates all game shows except for that one.  Talk about strange!


--- Quote ---The amount of whining in this thread is getting completely and utterly nauseating.
--- End quote ---

Well, I would hope that my responses weren't considered whining, but it's no surprise why this turned into a whining thread.  It's a programming change that's going to tick some people off (and, as is evident from the GSN boards, MANY!), and, to many of us, GSN is like our form of TV heaven, and we don't like things that could interfere with our TV heaven, right?  :).

Honestly, if GSN does turn into the next G4, I will be initially disappointed, but I've got tape after tape from the \"good ol' days,\" so I'll be kept busy for quite a while.  Hey; I lived through the USA abrupt end to the game show block; I can do this, too!  :)

Anthony

clemon79:
[quote name=\'beatlefreak84\' date=\'Jul 9 2003, 09:33 AM\'] Maybe next time I'll BOLD the smiley face, Chris!  
Trust me, I don't have a hit list of all GSN employees on my computer, okay?  
 [/quote]
 Mea culpa, you're right, and my comments weren't directed towards you specifically. While you seem to have enough sense to accept what's going on, a lot of folks who have been yammering on about this don't.


--- Quote ---Well, I would hope that my responses weren't considered whining, but it's no surprise why this turned into a whining thread.
--- End quote ---

Again, that wasn't directed at you, just the overall tone of what I've seen. We've got people screaming like the world is coming to an end, and while I love game shows as much as anyone here, if the evolution of GSN is really impacting your (the global \"your\") life in a negative way that much, I'm thinking some folks here would do well to pick up an extra hobby or two.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version