Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: How Would Fremantle Revive These Shows  (Read 7291 times)

JMFabiano

  • Member
  • Posts: 1549
How Would Fremantle Revive These Shows
« Reply #30 on: January 09, 2004, 06:15:40 PM »
[quote name=\'fostergray82\' date=\'Jan 8 2004, 02:22 PM\']
HOLLYWOOD SQUARES: The celebrity board would be a video wall of pre-recorded celebrity answers, a la Scattergories

 [/quote]
 And to further make me suffer, instead of bringing back Caroline Rhea, they'll use the cartoon Aunt Hilda from Sabrina: The Animated Series.  Then, when Buena Vista's asking price for her appearances prove to be too much, they will replace her with the Hilda from the Sabrina cartoon that used to appear with the Archies.
I'm a pacifist, and even I would like to see a little more action.

chris319

  • Co-Executive Producer
  • Posts: 10599
How Would Fremantle Revive These Shows
« Reply #31 on: January 10, 2004, 04:11:42 PM »
Quote
PYRAMID: In the main game, time would be shortened to 25 seconds. the winner's circle would be GREATLY dumbed down. Host: Donny Osmond
And no contestants over the age of 39 and no celebrities of any notoriety.

tvrandywest

  • Member
  • Posts: 1656
How Would Fremantle Revive These Shows
« Reply #32 on: January 10, 2004, 04:29:33 PM »
[quote name=\'chris319\' date=\'Jan 10 2004, 01:11 PM\']
Quote
PYRAMID: In the main game, time would be shortened to 25 seconds. the winner's circle would be GREATLY dumbed down. Host: Donny Osmond
And no contestants over the age of 39 and no celebrities of any notoriety. [/quote]
Subtlety AND sarcasm in the same post. It's only January; if this continues it's going to be tough to pick the most amusing posts for 2004!    ;-)

Randy
tvrandywest.com
« Last Edit: January 10, 2004, 04:31:37 PM by tvrandywest »
The story behind the voice you know and love... the voice of a generation of game shows: Johnny Olson!

Celebrate the centennial of the America's favorite announcer with "Johnny Olson: A Voice in Time."

Preview the book free: click "Johnny O Tribute" http://www.tvrandywest.com

PeterMarshallFan

  • Guest
How Would Fremantle Revive These Shows
« Reply #33 on: January 10, 2004, 04:36:45 PM »
CROSS-WITS: make most of the words four letters. That way you have a chance of hearing that oh-so-edgy censor SFX! And rename it Half-Wits or Nit-Wits.

TWISTERS: Contestants actually play the game Twister on stage, earning $2 for every correct move. The winner gets the big money jackpot of $10.

THE JOKER'S WILD: Have the Devil rap in the endgame, and get a host on a sugar kick.

THE PERFECT MATCH '68: just reviving it is bad enough. :-)

MSTieScott

  • Executive Producer
  • Posts: 1839
How Would Fremantle Revive These Shows
« Reply #34 on: January 10, 2004, 05:53:47 PM »
Note to all lurking game show producers: I've already beaten you to creating the perfect game show to attract those valuable young demographics. Sorry.

It's called "The X Show," since X reminds people of both the word "extreme" and porn. It will be pitched as "'Friends' meets 'The Simple Life'" -- it has nothing to do with either of those shows, of course, but obviously, we're trying to get this thing on the air.

All of the contestants will be between 18 and 26 years of age, and all will be physically attractive and outgoing. You'll see why in a moment.

The first round takes place at the in-studio pool, where the contestants will have to complete a stunt of some kind. The stunts will change between episodes... so far, our favorite is the one where the contestants have to dive in, grab a rod, climb out, bend over to untie the cover over a container on the floor, put the rod in the container, then jump up and down to ring a bell five times. The first four contestants to do so move on. Then, over slow-motion replays of the action, the winning and losing contestants narrate how they felt while participating in the stunt, trash-talking their competitors in the process.

After a commercial break, it's time for the second round, the freestyle competition. Each contestant, still in their bathing suit from the pool stunt, will be given an object (such as a zucchini or a can of whipped cream). A dance beat will be piped in, and each contestant will have sixty seconds to do whatever they want with the object while dancing. The audience will vote for the best two dancers. Before the voting process, the host will elaborate in great detail on telling the audience which number to press to vote for each contestant, while clips of each contestant dancing are replayed (hey, we've got 22 minutes we've got to fill here).

After the commercial break, the two remaining contestants, each alone with a camera pointed at them, reflect on what's happened so far while the best action shots are played again. Name-calling will be encouraged.

Another commercial break, the closed-captioning sponsor plugs, the promotional consideration plugs, and then it's time for the last round: "X Words" (Not "crosswords." The letter "X," then "Words"). We've... um... "sampled" this round from Password. The different thing is, the host gives all of the clues, which have been written for him in advance. To be as edgy as possible, each X Word will be slapped onto the screen in an elaborate animation, accompanied by a scream appropriate of somebody participating in an extreme sport. Also, each clue will be screamed by the host, to keep the energy up. For example, if the X Word was "mistake," the host would start by screaming "BONER!" If the X Word was "diaphragm," the host's first clue would be bleeped. The two contestants buzz in to try to identify the X Word. They may buzz in as many times as they wish, anytime they wish. The first contestant to correctly identify three X Words wins.

And what do they win? That's the beauty of it! There aren't any prizes! You just play some loud music, yell that they've won, then immediately end the show! Nobody will notice! During the credits, just show some replays of the first two segments again, maybe with some more vindictive commentary by the losing contestants. Instant hit!

--
Scott Robinson

chris319

  • Co-Executive Producer
  • Posts: 10599
How Would Fremantle Revive These Shows
« Reply #35 on: January 10, 2004, 08:37:51 PM »
[quote name=\'tvrandywest\' date=\'Jan 10 2004, 01:29 PM\'][quote name=\'chris319\' date=\'Jan 10 2004, 01:11 PM\']
Quote
PYRAMID: In the main game, time would be shortened to 25 seconds. the winner's circle would be GREATLY dumbed down. Host: Donny Osmond
And no contestants over the age of 39 and no celebrities of any notoriety. [/quote]
Subtlety AND sarcasm in the same post.[/quote]
I charge extra for the subtlety.

Fedya

  • Member
  • Posts: 2105
How Would Fremantle Revive These Shows
« Reply #36 on: January 10, 2004, 08:51:03 PM »
[quote name=\'chris319\' date=\'Jan 9 2004, 12:49 PM\'] CONCENTRATION - Behind each prize is a picture of a famous person. Not part of a picture, but the entire picture.

This saves money because the puzzle will be solved after only one prize has been won. [/quote]
 And what if neither player recognizes who the "famous" person is?

Similar things have happened on Street Smarts, after all.  :-)
-- Ted Schuerzinger, now blogging at http://justacineast.blogspot.com/

No Fark slashes were harmed in the making of this post

catkins522

  • Member
  • Posts: 541
How Would Fremantle Revive These Shows
« Reply #37 on: January 10, 2004, 09:00:10 PM »
Quote
JEOPARDY! Contestants are given the answers AND the questions. They just have to buzz-in. Host: Judy Tanuda (SP?)

I think that they have done that...or SNL did it.  I think it was "Bible Trivia Challenge" starring Norm MacDonald, who was a contestant who knew "all of the answers."

Charles
-----------

Bigger and better....in HD!!!!

Robert Hutchinson

  • Member
  • Posts: 2333
How Would Fremantle Revive These Shows
« Reply #38 on: January 11, 2004, 01:37:19 AM »
[quote name=\'Fedya\' date=\'Jan 10 2004, 08:51 PM\']And what if neither player recognizes who the "famous" person is?[/quote]
"I'm very sorry, but neither of you win. Let's meet our next two contestants!"

[quote name=\'catkins522\' date=\'Jan 10 2004, 09:00 PM\']I think that they have done that...or SNL did it. I think it was "Bible Trivia Challenge" starring Norm MacDonald, who was a contestant who knew "all of the answers."[/quote]

The joke of that sketch was that all one had to do was claim to know the right answer, and the host and/or judges, taking the word of a good Christian, awarded them money right then and there. Norm's character was entering his fourth or fifth consecutive month on the show, I believe.

Anyway, I could almost see Fremantle wanting to make a spinoff out of the Jeopardy! category STUPID ANSWERS. (Not if they understood how the category actually worked, of course.)
Visit my CB radio at www.twitter.com/ertchin

catkins522

  • Member
  • Posts: 541
How Would Fremantle Revive These Shows
« Reply #39 on: January 11, 2004, 07:50:05 AM »
Quote
Anyway, I could almost see Fremantle wanting to make a spinoff out of the Jeopardy! category STUPID ANSWERS. (Not if they understood how the category actually worked, of course.)

Already made...it was/is called "CELEBRITY JEOPARDY!"  I wondered if they have a "do-not-call" list to Sean Connery and Burt Reynolds.

Charles
-----------

Bigger and better....in HD!!!!

chris319

  • Co-Executive Producer
  • Posts: 10599
How Would Fremantle Revive These Shows
« Reply #40 on: January 11, 2004, 02:03:57 PM »
Quote
And what if neither player recognizes who the "famous" person is?

Then the emcee stage whispers the name like Nancy used to do with Ronnie.

Fedya

  • Member
  • Posts: 2105
How Would Fremantle Revive These Shows
« Reply #41 on: January 11, 2004, 10:18:21 PM »
[quote name=\'chris319\' date=\'Jan 11 2004, 02:03 PM\']
Quote
And what if neither player recognizes who the "famous" person is?
Then the emcee stage whispers the name like Nancy used to do with Ronnie. [/quote]
 Hmmm....

This trick would work to dumb down Password as well.  :-)
-- Ted Schuerzinger, now blogging at http://justacineast.blogspot.com/

No Fark slashes were harmed in the making of this post

CherryPizza

  • Guest
How Would Fremantle Revive These Shows
« Reply #42 on: January 11, 2004, 10:52:16 PM »
How about WIN BEN STEIN'S RICE-A-RONI?

(the punchlines really write themselves)

tommycharles

  • Guest
How Would Fremantle Revive These Shows
« Reply #43 on: January 12, 2004, 12:33:16 AM »
[quote name=\'Fedya\' date=\'Jan 11 2004, 10:18 PM\'] [quote name=\'chris319\' date=\'Jan 11 2004, 02:03 PM\']
Quote
And what if neither player recognizes who the "famous" person is?
Then the emcee stage whispers the name like Nancy used to do with Ronnie. [/quote]
Hmmm....

This trick would work to dumb down Password as well.  :-) [/quote]
 Actually that's even easier - just have the announcer whisper the password like he usually would, but put it through the studio speakers. The home audience would never know.

By the way - to ask another question that's off the subject: Chris C. - do you know why Gene didn't whisper the password on P+ ??

T

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27567
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
How Would Fremantle Revive These Shows
« Reply #44 on: January 12, 2004, 01:46:34 AM »
[quote name=\'tommycharles\' date=\'Jan 11 2004, 10:33 PM\'] By the way - to ask another question that's off the subject: Chris C. - do you know why Gene didn't whisper the password on P+ ??
 [/quote]
 My guess is: "'Cuz."

They didn't whisper passwords at the start of the Super Password run, either. after a while, they decided to bring that tradition back. I thought it was cheesy, myself.
Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe