Author Topic: Picture of TPiR's new showcase podiums (Read 67338 times)

chad1m · « **Reply #240 on:** September 09, 2009, 07:03:18 PM »

[quote name=\'clemon79\' post=\'225461\' date=\'Sep 9 2009, 06:28 PM\']I was just wondering about why it was mentioned.[/quote]...because Claudia was mentioned, who made that allegation.

pentellit · « **Reply #241 on:** September 09, 2009, 07:45:05 PM »

[quote name=\'CarShark\' post=\'225454\' date=\'Sep 9 2009, 02:10 PM\'][quote name=\'pentellit\' post=\'225440\' date=\'Sep 9 2009, 01:05 PM\']One model, who shall remain nameless (see Claudia Jordan's twitter) actually left Price because it was such an awful place to work.[/quote]Just about ruined these for me.
[/quote]
Ooohhh, someone is familiar with TPIR lawsuits! (Or has been doing his homework....). Which is it?

/Thanks Matt for that taste of Mario eye candy

//Does anyone know; Is it humanly possible to be more cut than Mario? Is there such a thing as a 24pack?

ClockGameJohn · « **Reply #242 on:** September 09, 2009, 08:01:09 PM »

[quote name=\'chris319\' post=\'225397\' date=\'Sep 8 2009, 09:08 PM\']John -

Do you have national ratings?[/quote]

[quote name=\'pentellit\' post=\'225408\' date=\'Sep 8 2009, 11:03 PM\']RE ratings John: Yes, declining before announcement - up after, culminating with Barker's final week with numbers like he hadn't gotten in ages. I also said "The View will continually eat TPIR for lunch with it's demographic".[/quote]

Actually, again not true.

The week of October 23-27, 2006 (the week prior to Barker's retirement announcement) here were the ratings:

PRICE (1st Half): 3.6/13 Share
VIEW (1st Half): 2.7/10 Share

PRICE (2nd Half): 4.2/16 Share
VIEW (2nd Half): 2.5/9 Share

PRICE AVERAGE: 3.9/14.5
VIEW AVERAGE: 2.6/9.5

The week of October 30-November 3, 2006 (the week after Barker's retirement announcement) here were the ratings:

PRICE (1st Half): 3.4/13 Share (-.2)
VIEW (1st Half): 2.8/11 Share (+.1)

PRICE (2nd Half): 4.2/16 Share (-)
VIEW (2nd Half): 2.6/10 Share (+.1)

PRICE AVERAGE: 3.8/14.5 (-.1)
VIEW AVERAGE: 2.7/10.5 (+.1)

The week of June 11-15, 2007 (the week of Barker's final shows) here were the ratings:

PRICE (1st Half): 3.7/13 Share
VIEW (1st Half): 2.7/10 Share

PRICE (2nd Half): 4.5/16 Share
VIEW (2nd Half): 2.6/9 Share

PRICE AVERAGE: 4.1/11.5
VIEW AVERAGE: 2.65/9.5

The week of October 15-19, 2007 (the week of Drew's first shows) here were the ratings:

PRICE (1st Half): 3.8/14 Share
VIEW (1st Half): 3.0/11 Share

PRICE (2nd Half): 4.3/16 Share
VIEW (2nd Half): 2.7/10 Share

PRICE AVERAGE: 4.05/15
VIEW AVERAGE: 2.85/10.5

One year later, October 13-17, 2008...

PRICE (1st Half): 2.6/10 Share (-1.2)
VIEW (1st Half): 3.1/12 Share (+.1)

PRICE (2nd Half): 3.3/12 Share (-1.0)
VIEW (2nd Half): 3.0/11 Share (+.3)

PRICE AVERAGE: 2.95/11 (-1.1)
VIEW AVERAGE: 3.05/11.5 (+.2)

chris319 · « **Reply #243 on:** September 09, 2009, 08:19:07 PM »

Nice job, John. What are the latest you have?

ClockGameJohn · « **Reply #244 on:** September 09, 2009, 08:23:52 PM »

I'm not at home right now, so the last I have access to are saved in my e-mail.

Week of November 17-21, 2008:

PRICE (1st Half): 2.9/11 Share
VIEW (1st Half): 3.2/12 Share

PRICE (2nd Half): 3.5/13 Share
VIEW (2nd Half): 3.1/11 Share

PRICE AVERAGE: 3.2/12
VIEW AVERAGE: 3.15/11.5

pentellit · « **Reply #245 on:** September 09, 2009, 08:43:26 PM »

Wow, even I fell for the Barker PR spin about the high ratings his last shows got! Wow. Thanks for the clarification, good to know.

chris319 · « **Reply #246 on:** September 09, 2009, 08:51:02 PM »

Any nationals for 2009?

TPIR went from about a 4 to about a 3 in the year subsequent to Drew's taking over, about a 25% drop.

These numbers don't take into account clearances.

ClockGameJohn · « **Reply #247 on:** September 09, 2009, 08:56:08 PM »

[quote name=\'chris319\' post=\'225478\' date=\'Sep 9 2009, 08:51 PM\']Any nationals for 2009?[/quote]

Not with me here. There was an article a few months ago just prior to the end of the Season that noted Price's ratings dropped another 6% this past Season after they dropped 12% his first year.

http://daytimeconfidential.com/2009/05/the...loss-of-ratings

Steve Gavazzi · « **Reply #248 on:** September 09, 2009, 09:01:30 PM »

[quote name=\'pentellit\' post=\'225477\' date=\'Sep 9 2009, 08:43 PM\']Wow, even I fell for the Barker PR spin about the high ratings his last shows got! Wow. Thanks for the clarification, good to know.[/quote]
You mean you were -- *gasp* -- wrong about something?!

...no, it couldn't be. I must have misread it.

*Reads again*

Nope, it's true -- the Pen didn't know what it was Telling.

Incidentally, I can't say I remember any "spin" about the ratings in question -- just a lot of assumptions that they'd be higher which were, apparently, never backed up by anyone actually finding them.

pentellit · « **Reply #249 on:** September 09, 2009, 09:04:18 PM »

[quote name=\'Steve Gavazzi\' post=\'225482\' date=\'Sep 9 2009, 06:01 PM\'][quote name=\'pentellit\' post=\'225477\' date=\'Sep 9 2009, 08:43 PM\']Wow, even I fell for the Barker PR spin about the high ratings his last shows got! Wow. Thanks for the clarification, good to know.[/quote]
You mean you were -- *gasp* -- wrong about something?![/quote]
Yep, and I admit it!

BrandonFG · « **Reply #250 on:** September 09, 2009, 09:12:53 PM »

[quote name=\'Steve Gavazzi\' post=\'225482\' date=\'Sep 9 2009, 09:01 PM\'][quote name=\'pentellit\' post=\'225477\' date=\'Sep 9 2009, 08:43 PM\']Wow, even I fell for the Barker PR spin about the high ratings his last shows got! Wow. Thanks for the clarification, good to know.[/quote]
You mean you were -- *gasp* -- wrong about something?!

...no, it couldn't be. I must have misread it.

*Reads again*

Nope, it's true -- the Pen didn't know what it was Telling.

Incidentally, I can't say I remember any "spin" about the ratings in question -- just a lot of assumptions that they'd be higher which were, apparently, never backed up by anyone actually finding them.
[/quote]
Steve, please. Not another one.

TimK2003 · « **Reply #251 on:** September 09, 2009, 09:31:27 PM »

[quote name=\'pentellit\' post=\'225433\' date=\'Sep 9 2009, 10:37 AM\'][quote name=\'Joe Mello\' post=\'225432\' date=\'Sep 9 2009, 08:08 AM\'][quote name=\'pentellit\' post=\'225408\' date=\'Sep 8 2009, 11:03 PM\'][quote name=\'ClockGameJohn\' post=\'225374\' date=\'Sep 8 2009, 01:14 PM\']They could have hired suave Mario Lopez, if the only thing in mind was to attract young females.[/quote]

But how could they script it so Mario would be shirtless at least once during both half hours?

[/quote]
You're thinking of Matthew McConaughey.
[/quote]
Have you seen Mario shirtless? Mario works for me!

/If I knew how you guys insert those links I would link the "Mario Bares All" shot from People Mag...yuhummmmm!
[/quote]

Mr. Davidson would like a word with you, Pent...
[color=\"#FF0000\"]
WARNING: Not for the faint of heart!!![/color] (Yeah, it's THAT photo of John Davidson!!)

pentellit · « **Reply #252 on:** September 09, 2009, 09:38:27 PM »

^NO WAY! Is that for real TimK2003? Nah, gotta be Photo Shop. Is it? Oh, you are bad!

chris319 · « **Reply #253 on:** September 09, 2009, 09:43:59 PM »

Quote

Steve, please. Not another one.

What Brandon said.

tyshaun1 · « **Reply #254 on:** September 09, 2009, 10:02:09 PM »

[quote name=\'ClockGameJohn\' post=\'225473\' date=\'Sep 9 2009, 08:23 PM\']I'm not at home right now, so the last I have access to are saved in my e-mail.

Week of November 17-21, 2008:

PRICE (1st Half): 2.9/11 Share
VIEW (1st Half): 3.2/12 Share

PRICE (2nd Half): 3.5/13 Share
VIEW (2nd Half): 3.1/11 Share

PRICE AVERAGE: 3.2/12
VIEW AVERAGE: 3.15/11.5[/quote]
This was right around the elections, when The View was getting a TON of buzz. It is usually now the #1 show in all of daytime currently (based off what I've read), while TPIR bounces around between 1st and 3rd.

Tyshaun