Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Where are the Daily Doubles?  (Read 5509 times)

alfonzos

  • Member
  • Posts: 1017
A Cliff Saber Production
email address: alfonzos@aol.com
Boardgame Geek user name: alfonzos

TLEberle

  • Member
  • Posts: 15592
  • Rules Constable
Re: Where are the Daily Doubles?
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2015, 08:13:38 PM »
Watson's choice of column one, $800 was a good one according to this, and prescient.

Interesting to note that the practice of putting a DD in the top row at all was over with fairly early, and column one for $200 has no entry at all.

/Great data, lousy spelling. Maybe it's unfare to criticize the author for that, but here we are.
Travis L. Eberle

Fedya

  • Member
  • Posts: 2104
Re: Where are the Daily Doubles?
« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2015, 08:22:49 PM »
Quote
Watson's choice of column one, $800 was a good one according to this, and prescient.

Wasn't it mentioned back then that Watson specifically analyzed that the DD was most often in that box?
-- Ted Schuerzinger, now blogging at http://justacineast.blogspot.com/

No Fark slashes were harmed in the making of this post

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27557
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
Re: Where are the Daily Doubles?
« Reply #3 on: March 03, 2015, 11:29:14 PM »
/Great data, lousy spelling. Maybe it's unfare to criticize the author for that, but here we are.

Pet peeve! :D
Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe

TLEberle

  • Member
  • Posts: 15592
  • Rules Constable
Re: Where are the Daily Doubles?
« Reply #4 on: March 03, 2015, 11:37:35 PM »
Pet peeve! :D
That was in fact the joke--the original article spelled it "fair" when he meant fare as in "how a person would do" in the second graf.

Not a great joke, but one nonetheless, unless I missed a reference or something.
Travis L. Eberle

PYLdude

  • Member
  • Posts: 8226
  • Still crazy after all these years.
Re: Where are the Daily Doubles?
« Reply #5 on: March 04, 2015, 03:24:14 AM »
/Great data, lousy spelling. Maybe it's unfare to criticize the author for that, but here we are.

Pet peeve! :D

When was the last time someone trotted that out? Wow...

(good wow,.good wow)
I suppose you can still learn stuff on TLC, though it would be more in the Goofus & Gallant sense, that is (don't do what these parents did)"- Travis Eberle, 2012

“We’re game show fans. ‘Weird’ comes with the territory.” - Matt Ottinger, 2022

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27557
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
Re: Where are the Daily Doubles?
« Reply #6 on: March 04, 2015, 01:44:57 PM »
That was in fact the joke--the original article spelled it "fair" when he meant fare as in "how a person would do" in the second graf.

Ah, see, I was searching for that, but I only searched the article for "unfare." Didn't think to search for the positive version. Carry on. :)
Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe

whewfan

  • Member
  • Posts: 2011
Re: Where are the Daily Doubles?
« Reply #7 on: March 19, 2015, 07:32:20 AM »
Is it also safe to say that both Daily Doubles for round 2 have NEVER been in the same category?

Matt Ottinger

  • Member
  • Posts: 12855
Re: Where are the Daily Doubles?
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2015, 10:46:29 AM »
Is it also safe to say that both Daily Doubles for round 2 have NEVER been in the same category?

I can't remember whether we were told that was a specific rule or not, but in half a century of Jeopardy!, I don't believe they've ever done it.  So yeah, that's a safe bet.
This has been another installment of Matt Ottinger's Masters of the Obvious.
Stay tuned for all the obsessive-compulsive fun of Words Have Meanings.

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27557
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
Re: Where are the Daily Doubles?
« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2015, 10:47:53 AM »
Is it also safe to say that both Daily Doubles for round 2 have NEVER been in the same category?

Only because to do so would be HUGELY lopsided if one contestant was much stronger in that particular category than their opponents, yeah, I'd say it's safe to say that.
Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe