Author Topic: Where do you differ from the norm? (Read 71688 times)

wdm1219inpenna · « **Reply #210 on:** July 12, 2011, 01:33:18 PM »

Quote from: Steve Gavazzi on July 11, 2011, 10:10:59 PM

I can't believe there's still anyone who believes it wasn't Barker.

Except perhaps Barker himself...

clemon79 · « **Reply #211 on:** July 12, 2011, 02:31:46 PM »

Quote from: SRIV94 on July 12, 2011, 12:21:14 PM

The host didn't help.

Honestly, for me anyhow, the host didn't matter. You could have reanimated Bill Cullen and it still would have blown. The format of we're-gonna-play-X-puzzles-high-score-wins was just uninteresting and the bonus game was totally uninspired.

Which is not to say that the Shoot For The Stars format was perfect - certainly the random elements don't help from a game-fairness standpoint, but at least it's more engaging to watch than Double Talk.

Matt Ottinger · « **Reply #212 on:** July 12, 2011, 02:48:39 PM »

Quote from: clemon79 on July 12, 2011, 02:31:46 PM

You could have reanimated Bill Cullen and it still would have blown.

For the record, you wouldn't have needed to.

SRIV94 · « **Reply #213 on:** July 12, 2011, 02:50:12 PM »

Quote from: clemon79 on July 12, 2011, 02:31:46 PM

Quote from: SRIV94 on July 12, 2011, 12:21:14 PM
The host didn't help.
Honestly, for me anyhow, the host didn't matter. You could have reanimated Bill Cullen and it still would have blown. The format of we're-gonna-play-X-puzzles-high-score-wins was just uninteresting and the bonus game was totally uninspired.

Agreed. What I meant to say is that the host wouldn't have helped any show.