Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: WWTBAM bringing back phone qualification...  (Read 23343 times)

dscungio

  • Member
  • Posts: 198
WWTBAM bringing back phone qualification...
« Reply #30 on: July 08, 2009, 12:37:28 AM »
I forgot to call Monday night, so Tuesday night was my first shot.  I got to Q4, but it was putting recent novels in order of publication.  Of course, it had to be literature, my weakest suit.  Gotta try again.



Dean

/. o O ( The Pop-up recaps may return! )

ChuckNet

  • Member
  • Posts: 2193
WWTBAM bringing back phone qualification...
« Reply #31 on: July 08, 2009, 01:02:39 AM »
Almost qualified last night, but got tripped up on the final question...had to put 4 artists in order by DOB, starting w/earliest, and having only heard of one in the batch, I attempted to make an educated guess, but it was no go.

Chuck Donegan (The Illustrious "Chuckie Baby")

knagl

  • Executive Producer
  • Posts: 902
WWTBAM bringing back phone qualification...
« Reply #32 on: July 08, 2009, 08:16:10 PM »
I just tried.  I screwed up the order of Levi's and London Fog on question 3 (Levi Strauss is older, I flipped the order because I didn't know how old London Fog was).

Yes, I thought the questions were read faster than ever.

...and yes, the phone system brought back memories since it was the exact same recordings for most all of the prompts, reminding me of doing this years ago.  :)

BrandonFG

  • Member
  • Posts: 18195
WWTBAM bringing back phone qualification...
« Reply #33 on: July 08, 2009, 08:40:07 PM »
I tried again, and actually made it to question five, and messed up there. Despite my ineligibility, I actually felt myself getting amped before wondering just what the hell I would do if I were actually selected. :-P

Question five: Put these four musical artists in order of birth, starting with the earliest... 1. Brandy 2. Prince 3. Seal 4. Eminem...I thought I did 2-3-4-1, which should be the right answer...(1979-1958-1963-1972). Of course, with everything going so fast, I obviously did something wrong.

/Or maybe it was starting with the most recent. :-P
« Last Edit: July 08, 2009, 08:41:58 PM by fostergray82 »
"I just wanna give a shoutout to my homies in their late-30s who are watching this on Paramount+ right now, cause they couldn't stay up late enough to watch it live!"

Now celebrating his 21st season on GSF!

chad1m

  • Member
  • Posts: 2867
WWTBAM bringing back phone qualification...
« Reply #34 on: July 08, 2009, 11:33:38 PM »
I made it to question #4. I had absolutely no idea and was running out of time, so I put 4-3-2-1 and hoped for the best, but after realizing #1 should have went first as I was punching the numbers in, I realized I was screwed. If I'd have remembered that in time, I would have been right as the order was 1-4-3-2.

[quote name=\'fostergray82\' post=\'219805\' date=\'Jul 8 2009, 08:40 PM\']I actually felt myself getting amped before wondering just what the hell I would do if I were actually selected. :-P[/quote]You hang up really quickly before they ask you to select a tape date with a sense of satisfaction. ;)
« Last Edit: July 08, 2009, 11:37:53 PM by chad1m »

Thunder

  • Member
  • Posts: 1054
WWTBAM bringing back phone qualification...
« Reply #35 on: July 08, 2009, 11:41:22 PM »
Well, I was One-And-Done tonight.

My July 8th Wipeout - Click if you want to hear it.

(Advisory: MP3 file, ~500 KB. Should stream on most computer systems.)

chad1m

  • Member
  • Posts: 2867
WWTBAM bringing back phone qualification...
« Reply #36 on: July 08, 2009, 11:43:42 PM »
[quote name=\'Thunder\' post=\'219816\' date=\'Jul 8 2009, 11:41 PM\']My July 8th Wipeout - Click if you want to hear it.[/quote]Oh my.

Thunder

  • Member
  • Posts: 1054
WWTBAM bringing back phone qualification...
« Reply #37 on: July 08, 2009, 11:46:58 PM »
I am truly an idiot.

chad1m

  • Member
  • Posts: 2867
WWTBAM bringing back phone qualification...
« Reply #38 on: July 08, 2009, 11:48:42 PM »
[quote name=\'Thunder\' post=\'219818\' date=\'Jul 8 2009, 11:46 PM\']I am truly an idiot.[/quote]Did you fat-finger it or did you truly not know it?

Thunder

  • Member
  • Posts: 1054
WWTBAM bringing back phone qualification...
« Reply #39 on: July 08, 2009, 11:52:31 PM »
Well, I do have an excuse. I was adding audio capabilities to the blog that my friends and I put together, so I was making sure that everything was recording properly. By the time that happened, I wasn't properly paying attention to the answers.


But the recording worked perfectly!

dscungio

  • Member
  • Posts: 198
WWTBAM bringing back phone qualification...
« Reply #40 on: July 09, 2009, 12:27:24 AM »
Woohoo!  I got past the five questions tonight!  I lucked out with the subject matter this time.  I chose 7/29 as my tape date, and it's all up to the luck of the draw now.  Wish me luck next week!



Dean

chad1m

  • Member
  • Posts: 2867
WWTBAM bringing back phone qualification...
« Reply #41 on: July 09, 2009, 12:37:42 AM »
[quote name=\'dscungio\' post=\'219826\' date=\'Jul 9 2009, 12:27 AM\']Wish me luck next week![/quote]You got it. Go get 'em!

chad1m

  • Member
  • Posts: 2867
WWTBAM bringing back phone qualification...
« Reply #42 on: July 09, 2009, 07:18:04 PM »
Well, I "made it" to question five tonight, but got tripped up on Girl Scout rankings.

Matt Ottinger

  • Member
  • Posts: 12852
WWTBAM bringing back phone qualification...
« Reply #43 on: July 09, 2009, 07:45:17 PM »
[quote name=\'chad1m\' post=\'219888\' date=\'Jul 9 2009, 07:18 PM\']Well, I "made it" to question five tonight, but got tripped up on Girl Scout rankings.[/quote]
It's Tagalongs, Do-Si-Dos, Thin Mints and THEN Samoas.
This has been another installment of Matt Ottinger's Masters of the Obvious.
Stay tuned for all the obsessive-compulsive fun of Words Have Meanings.

chad1m

  • Member
  • Posts: 2867
WWTBAM bringing back phone qualification...
« Reply #44 on: July 09, 2009, 07:46:45 PM »
[quote name=\'Matt Ottinger\' post=\'219892\' date=\'Jul 9 2009, 07:45 PM\']It's Tagalongs, Do-Si-Dos, Thin Mints and THEN Samoas.[/quote]No, siree. Thin Mints is always at the end of any list involving cookies. The real question (if allowed) was:

Put these Girl Scouts levels in order, starting with the lowest.
1) Senior
2) Junior
3) Cadette
4) Brownie

Answers:

4) Brownie
2) Junior
3) Cadette
1) Senior

(I said 4-3-2-1)