The Game Show Forum

The Game Show Forum => Game Show Channels & Networks => Topic started by: dzinkin on December 09, 2003, 08:08:02 PM

Title: More on GSN's "evolution"...
Post by: dzinkin on December 09, 2003, 08:08:02 PM
Boden Out at GSN
By R. Thomas Umstead
Multichannel News, 12/9/2003 5:32:00 PM

Veteran Game Show Network executive Bob Boden is out as senior vice president of programming amid a network move toward more reality-based, game-oriented shows.

GSN president Rich Cronin would not comment on Boden’s departure, but he said the network is conducting a search for a new programming head. Current VP of programming Kevin Belinkoff will handle Boden’s duties in the interim.

Boden, an avid classic-game-show fan, joined the network in 2001 and oversaw its acquisition of several top-rated off-network game shows, including Who Wants to Be a Millionaire and The Weakest Link. He also presided over the development of such original programming as reality series Naturally Stoned and game shows Cram and Lingo.

GSN, though, has been moving away from classic game shows and more toward reality and other game-oriented programming. The network recently announced the development of Boden-commissioned reality series Fake-a-Date, as well as National Lampoon’s Greek Games, a competition between rival fraternities and sororities.

Cronin eventually envisions the network devoting only 25% of its primetime lineup to traditional game-show programming. "We’re continuing with the evolution of Game Show Network," he said.

In November, GSN averaged a 0.6 primetime rating, up 20% over the same period last year.

***********************

"Evolution" my @$$...

 - David
Title: More on GSN's "evolution"...
Post by: itiparanoid13 on December 09, 2003, 08:10:28 PM
i dont think the reason their prime time is so high is because of a GAME SHOW!!  Millionaire made their prime time what it is, and yet they go on with reality.  maybe Boden leaving wasnt what was needed.  maybe Cronin needs to leave now also.
Title: More on GSN's "evolution"...
Post by: Jamey Greek on December 09, 2003, 08:11:54 PM
Yeah! Since, Boden is resigning GSN is going down.  He was there since it's inception, and he is a classic Game Show Fan.  I think he is getting tired of all this Mess, like us.
Title: More on GSN's "evolution"...
Post by: PeterMarshallFan on December 09, 2003, 08:14:02 PM
Sigh. Maybe Bob will keep the dream of a network for game shows alive someday, but for now, who wants to chip in for the headstone? :-P
Title: More on GSN's "evolution"...
Post by: GS Warehouse on December 09, 2003, 10:34:04 PM
So there's our big announcement.  GSN is becoming just another cable lemming.  [sigh] The advertisers have won.
Title: More on GSN's "evolution"...
Post by: Matt Ottinger on December 09, 2003, 10:49:54 PM
[quote name=\'GS Warehouse\' date=\'Dec 9 2003, 11:34 PM\'] GSN is becoming just another cable lemming.  [sigh] The advertisers have won. [/quote]
 I've got my own problems with the direction GSN is heading as well, but let's keep in mind that in the world of commercial television, the advertisers HAVE to win.  That's the way the system works.  

The problem, best I can figure it, is that Sony and Liberty have a product that they want to be Spike TV, and it just isn't.  No amount of tweaking the "game" concept is going to draw the demographic they seem to be interested in.  It never occurred to me that they might be considering something as radical as what Mark suggested -- replacing the entire concept with an "action" network -- but with the genre's biggest champion out at GSN, I guess anything's possible.
Title: More on GSN's "evolution"...
Post by: dzinkin on December 09, 2003, 11:34:01 PM
[quote name=\'Matt Ottinger\' date=\'Dec 9 2003, 10:49 PM\'] I've got my own problems with the direction GSN is heading as well, but let's keep in mind that in the world of commercial television, the advertisers HAVE to win.  That's the way the system works. [/quote]
 Exactly.  And if you take the advertisers out of the equation, it'll never work.  No self-respecting PBS station would ever run a game show these days... right, Matt? :-D

 - David
(diving behind a snowbank)
Title: More on GSN's "evolution"...
Post by: whampyl03 on December 09, 2003, 11:54:24 PM
Quote
Cronin eventually envisions the network devoting only 25% of its primetime lineup to traditional game-show programming. "We’re continuing with the evolution of Game Show Network," he said.

OOF!  Well, I guess it's better than nothing at all.


Even though Bob made a few programming moves I was never favorable of, I think that Bob will be missed at the programming helm.
Title: More on GSN's "evolution"...
Post by: Dbacksfan12 on December 10, 2003, 01:12:03 AM
[quote name=\'Jamey Greek\' date=\'Dec 9 2003, 08:11 PM\'] Yeah! Since, Boden is resigning GSN is going down.  He was there since it's inception, and he is a classic Game Show Fan.  I think he is getting tired of all this Mess, like us. [/quote]
 If your going to try to post facts, at least make them accurate.
Title: More on GSN's "evolution"...
Post by: J.R. on December 10, 2003, 01:56:12 AM
You know, I would care less if GSN went under and cesed to exist. As it seems noone likes it anyway.

Belinkoff is probably reading this and thinking to himself: "Sigh... why did I take this job ? I have to appeal to these bitter obsessed wackos ?!"

Give him a chance. New Management is known for a few good suprises now and then.

Ever since I gave-up on watching GSN on a regular basis, I've found other good channels to watch. Like "Trio", which is a Rockin' channel ! (Just watched "Queen of a Day" !)

-Joe R.
Title: More on GSN's "evolution"...
Post by: zachhoran on December 10, 2003, 08:29:24 AM
[quote name=\'JRaygor\' date=\'Dec 10 2003, 01:56 AM\']
Ever since I gave-up on watching GSN on a regular basis, I've found other good channels to watch. Like "Trio", which is a Rockin' channel ! (Just watched "Queen of a Day" !)

-Joe R. [/quote]
 If Mark Jeffries is correct and GSN moves in the direction of Spike TV to get a younger demographic, Trio could stand to take a long look at Match Game and some of the Black and White shows and acquire them for their channel.
Title: More on GSN's "evolution"...
Post by: Fedya on December 10, 2003, 08:55:41 AM
[quote name=\'zachhoran\' date=\'Dec 10 2003, 08:29 AM\'] [quote name=\'JRaygor\' date=\'Dec 10 2003, 01:56 AM\']
Ever since I gave-up on watching GSN on a regular basis, I've found other good channels to watch. Like "Trio", which is a Rockin' channel ! (Just watched "Queen of a Day" !)

-Joe R. [/quote]
If Mark Jeffries is correct and GSN moves in the direction of Spike TV to get a younger demographic, Trio could stand to take a long look at Match Game and some of the Black and White shows and acquire them for their channel. [/quote]
 Unfortunately for those of us with DirecTV, they're currently in negotiations with Trio (or whoever owns Trio) on a new carriage agreement, and if the two parties can't reach an agreement by December 31, DirecTV subscribers will lose Trio for a period of time.

(At least, that's what I understand from the crawl running across the screen during Battle of the Network Stars and the Miss America Pageant from Monday.)
Title: More on GSN's "evolution"...
Post by: Jay Temple on December 10, 2003, 12:35:29 PM
[quote name=\'dzinkin\' date=\'Dec 9 2003, 07:08 PM\'] Cronin eventually envisions the network devoting only 25% of its primetime lineup to traditional game-show programming. "We’re continuing with the evolution of Game Show Network," he said. [/quote]
 Is it too soon to call this the MTV-ization of the channel?  (Oh, wait, do MTV and VH1 even have 25% left that's given to videos?)
Title: More on GSN's "evolution"...
Post by: SRIV94 on December 10, 2003, 12:45:28 PM
[quote name=\'Fedya\' date=\'Dec 10 2003, 07:55 AM\'] Unfortunately for those of us with DirecTV, they're currently in negotiations with Trio (or whoever owns Trio) on a new carriage agreement, and if the two parties can't reach an agreement by December 31, DirecTV subscribers will lose Trio for a period of time.
 [/quote]
 Isn't it Studios USA that owns Trio (wonder if that means you might be losing USA as well)?

Thank goodness for digital cable (except for when it screws me on ESPN Full Court).

Doug
Title: More on GSN's "evolution"...
Post by: WhammyPower on December 10, 2003, 01:45:52 PM
[quote name=\'SRIV94\' date=\'Dec 10 2003, 11:45 AM\'] [quote name=\'Fedya\' date=\'Dec 10 2003, 07:55 AM\'] Unfortunately for those of us with DirecTV, they're currently in negotiations with Trio (or whoever owns Trio) on a new carriage agreement, and if the two parties can't reach an agreement by December 31, DirecTV subscribers will lose Trio for a period of time.
 [/quote]
Isn't it Studios USA that owns Trio (wonder if that means you might be losing USA as well)?

Thank goodness for digital cable (except for when it screws me on ESPN Full Court).

Doug [/quote]
According to Trio's Terms & Conditions of Use (http://\"http://www.triotv.com/corp/terms.html\"):

"Trio Network, Universal Television Networks, part of the Universal Television Group (www.universalstudios.com), a division of Vivendi Universal Entertainment (VUE), and all subsidiary and affiliated companies."

Note: I also have DirecTV.  (I have been wanting to switch back to digital cable for months!)
Title: More on GSN's "evolution"...
Post by: SRIV94 on December 10, 2003, 02:22:11 PM
[quote name=\'WhammyPower\' date=\'Dec 10 2003, 12:45 PM\'] According to Trio's Terms & Conditions of Use (http://\"http://www.triotv.com/corp/terms.html\"):

"Trio Network, Universal Television Networks, part of the Universal Television Group (www.universalstudios.com), a division of Vivendi Universal Entertainment (VUE), and all subsidiary and affiliated companies."

Note: I also have DirecTV.  (I have been wanting to switch back to digital cable for months!) [/quote]
 It looks like Universal scooped up several properties along the way (Trio's website used to have the StudiosUSA logo--now USA and Bloomberg TV are also in Universal's fold).  Thanks for the clarification.

I just wish my digital cable carried Boomerang (I miss the classic stuff Cartoon Network used to show).

Doug
Title: More on GSN's "evolution"...
Post by: tommycharles on December 10, 2003, 03:17:18 PM
[quote name=\'SRIV94\' date=\'Dec 10 2003, 02:22 PM\']
I just wish my digital cable carried Boomerang (I miss the classic stuff Cartoon Network used to show).

Doug [/quote]
 Hey I'd be happy to have you take the Boomerang channel off of DirecTV, if you could do that. Everytime my niece comes over we have to watch cartoons....last time she stared at the Flintstones for 3 hours...

OBGameshow - she couldn't stand Louie Anderson's voice when he hosted Feud.
Title: More on GSN's "evolution"...
Post by: Terry K on December 10, 2003, 03:23:49 PM
Remember, USA and Trio are in the process of being sold to NBC.  Bloomberg doesn't go with them, since its under different ownership.
Title: More on GSN's "evolution"...
Post by: Dbacksfan12 on December 10, 2003, 05:35:46 PM
[quote name=\'tommycharles\' date=\'Dec 10 2003, 03:17 PM\'] [quote name=\'SRIV94\' date=\'Dec 10 2003, 02:22 PM\']
I just wish my digital cable carried Boomerang (I miss the classic stuff Cartoon Network used to show).

Doug [/quote]
Hey I'd be happy to have you take the Boomerang channel off of DirecTV, if you could do that. Everytime my niece comes over we have to watch cartoons....last time she stared at the Flintstones for 3 hours...

OBGameshow - she couldn't stand Louie Anderson's voice when he hosted Feud. [/quote]
 Boomerang, last I knew, was part of the optional $5.00/month "family pak", which also contained SoapNet and DIY.
Title: More on GSN's "evolution"...
Post by: trainman on December 11, 2003, 12:38:57 AM
[quote name=\'Dsmith\' date=\'Dec 10 2003, 02:35 PM\'] Boomerang, last I knew, was part of the optional $5.00/month "family pak", which also contained SoapNet and DIY. [/quote]
 Assuming we're still talking about DirecTV here, these days, Boomerang is part of the $1.00/month "Plus" addition to their regular "Total Choice" channel package.  Yes, that's one dollar for about 15 extra channels.  I assume the pricing makes sense to someone at DirecTV.
Title: More on GSN's "evolution"...
Post by: Dbacksfan12 on December 11, 2003, 04:16:11 AM
[quote name=\'trainman\' date=\'Dec 11 2003, 12:38 AM\'] [quote name=\'Dsmith\' date=\'Dec 10 2003, 02:35 PM\'] Boomerang, last I knew, was part of the optional $5.00/month "family pak", which also contained SoapNet and DIY. [/quote]
Assuming we're still talking about DirecTV here, these days, Boomerang is part of the $1.00/month "Plus" addition to their regular "Total Choice" channel package.  Yes, that's one dollar for about 15 extra channels.  I assume the pricing makes sense to someone at DirecTV. [/quote]

I was indeed talking about DirecTV.

However, I was unaware of the change.  While living at my parents house, we have different TV providers.  My parents utilize DirecTV, however, I use (and pay) for digital cable through Mediacom.

Interestingly, they have given Nick GAS an upgrade to the top digital tier, along with G4; and moved GSN and Trio to tier #2.
Title: More on GSN's "evolution"...
Post by: Thad Dixon on December 11, 2003, 10:20:10 AM
[quote name=\'Dsmith\' date=\'Dec 11 2003, 04:16 AM\']Interestingly, they have given Nick GAS an upgrade to the top digital tier, [/quote]
And speaking of Nick GAS, I am not sure if either Brakus, fostergray82, or wxfrcaster has mentioned it yet, but Cox will be adding that to their digital tier (in Hampton Roads) come Dec. 31.  They will have it on the same tier they have GSN on right now (it'll be on ch. 252).